surfing goat
ask away
show me sumfin
me
Archive
Posted 3 weeks ago with 28103 notes

samoishere:

laurdlannister-kingslayer:

swankypimp:

nonjudgementalme:

imsoshive:

The only Boo’d Up remix I acknowledge.

how smooth he hit the “in my dreams” I’m 💀

^^ real recognize real

This dude obsession with titties is admirable 

@staff hates him

Posted 3 weeks ago with 9269 notes
Fuck with someone that puts their pride aside for you.
Posted 3 weeks ago with 410368 notes

stability:

vespertineflora:

[audio transcript]

Woman: He’s fine. He misses you.

Man: Give him my love.

Woman: Will do. 

[woman looks at ridiculous oversized bird]

Woman: SQUAWK

Bird: SQUAWK

THE END

Good to know shitposting has been around since the inception of cinema

Posted 3 weeks ago with 196571 notes
osheamobile:
“ theweddingofthefoxes:
“ estebanwaseaten:
“ spacedijks:
“ enoughtohold:
“who is she
”
woman seeking woman. i’m six feet tall, fashionable, and enjoy long walks through brackish estuary water off the coast of virginia
”
She’s our most...
View high resolution

osheamobile:

theweddingofthefoxes:

estebanwaseaten:

spacedijks:

enoughtohold:

who is she

woman seeking woman. i’m six feet tall, fashionable, and enjoy long walks through brackish estuary water off the coast of virginia

She’s our most famous cryptid 

The bae in the bay

The Chesapeake Bae

Posted 3 weeks ago with 320 notes
monsterism:
“Martin Witfooth.
”
View high resolution

monsterism:

Martin Witfooth.

Posted 3 weeks ago with 506 notes
redlipstickresurrected:
“Suthipa Kamyam aka Toey aka สุทธิภา คำแย้ม (Thai, based Bangkok, Thailand) - Scarf Design (detail) for Jim Thompson (SS17)
”
View high resolution

redlipstickresurrected:

Suthipa Kamyam aka Toey aka สุทธิภา คำแย้ม (Thai, based Bangkok, Thailand) - Scarf Design (detail) for Jim Thompson (SS17)

Posted 3 weeks ago with 16895 notes

wodneswynn:

American literature:  Does success have meaning?

French literature:  Does love have meaning?

Russian literature:  Does suffering have meaning?

German literature:  No.

Posted 3 weeks ago with 342466 notes
ycontuespiritu:
“ stilllifequickheart:
“ Giovanna Garzoni
A Bitch
1648
”
um, rude? let her enjoy her snack in peace
”

ycontuespiritu:

stilllifequickheart:

Giovanna Garzoni

A Bitch

1648

um, rude? let her enjoy her snack in peace

Posted 3 weeks ago with 2091 notes

radicallyaligned:

One of the most harmful parts of girlhood is how we learn to use our bodies as currency.

Small smiles, clasped hands, and batted eyes gain us capital. We’re rewarded. We are allowed a snack or extra time outside if we agree to hug our caretakers. Our parents promise us dessert if we allow the great aunt to kiss us on the cheek. We begin to learn. And we grow a little and then it’s touching a male classmate on the elbow to convince him to help you on a question instead of ignore you, or making downcast eyes at a male teacher to ask sweetly for the bathroom pass so you’re more likely to have your bodily functions believed.

Then we age more and it’s low cut shirts so the cashier at the theater doesn’t check to see if you’re 17, and doing sex acts with your first boyfriend before you’re ready because you know if you don’t some other girl will and you know the more you do the longer he’ll stay.

It’s seeing TV shows and movies where the female spy/superhero/Jane Doe has to seduce the villain for information/entry/survival. It’s seeing TV shows and movies where if the man pursues you long enough/the hero saves your life/the outcast proves his worth then he deserves a kiss/taken to the bedroom/your hand in marriage. It’s the good and the bad guys having access to female bodies, your body, for different reasons. Its learning that you can use your female form to reward or deny, like it’s a sweet treat and not the thing you reside in, you yourself.

And this mentality, this commodification of our physical selves, its damaging. It warps how we view ourselves and our interactions with the world. It puts a “for sale” sign on us, and it says we can be bought, and we are left scrambling to set the price.

Posted 3 weeks ago with 6 notes
"What if works of art were considered to be what they actually are– frivolous objects or entities with no intrinsic value that only acquire value through a complex process of socialization during which some are empowered by an ongoing sequence of private, mercantile, journalistic, and institutional investments that are irrevocably extrinsic to them and any intention they might embody?"
Dave Hickey, Frivolty and Unction, 1996 (via kakaji)
Posted 3 weeks ago with 3 notes
kakaji:
“Pablo Helguera
”
View high resolution

kakaji:

Pablo Helguera

Posted 3 weeks ago with 117572 notes
karadin:
“Hate Speech is not Protected Speech
”
View high resolution

karadin:

Hate Speech is not Protected Speech

Start
00:00 AM